Palace Pushes Back: Are ‘Leaked’ DPWH Files Evidence—or Just Noise?

Malacañang has drawn a firm line in the sand over the controversy surrounding alleged “leaked” documents from the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH), insisting that the materials circulating online remain “hearsay without probative value.”

According to Claire Castro, Presidential Communications Office Undersecretary, the Palace rejected insinuations that it is covering up alleged irregularities tied to flood control projects. Castro stressed that without proper authentication from DPWH itself, the documents cannot be treated as evidence.

The Palace response came amid renewed political pressure following claims by Leandro Leviste, who alleged that the documents were received from the late DPWH official Maria Catalina Cabral. Malacañang countered that unverified lists, screenshots, or files — regardless of source — cannot substitute for formal proof.

Castro emphasized that it is not the Palace’s role to authenticate documents presented by accusers, noting that those making allegations carry the burden of substantiating them. She warned against premature conclusions that could distort public perception and undermine due process.

While reiterating President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.’s commitment to accountability, the Palace maintained that investigations must rely on verified records, sworn testimonies, and lawful procedures — not leaks of questionable origin.

The broader issue now confronting the public is trust:
Should leaked documents shape public judgment — or should accountability wait for evidence that can withstand legal scrutiny?

In a political climate charged with suspicion and anger, Malacañang’s message is clear: allegations are not convictions.