Philippines at Risk of Returning to Dirty Money List: A Warning the Government Can’t Ignore

The Philippines is once again facing a troubling possibility—a return to the global dirty money watchlist, a setback that could undermine years of efforts to clean up the country’s financial system.

According to recent warnings, international monitors are closely observing whether the Philippines can sustain reforms designed to combat money laundering and terrorist financing. Failure to meet these standards could result in renewed inclusion on the so-called “dirty money list,” formally known as the grey list maintained by the Financial Action Task Force.

Being placed back on the list would not be symbolic—it would be economically damaging.

Countries under increased monitoring face tighter scrutiny from foreign banks, higher transaction costs, reduced investor confidence, and slower cross-border trade. For a developing economy like the Philippines, this could translate into lost investments, higher borrowing costs, and fewer job opportunities.

The warning also raises uncomfortable questions about enforcement.

While laws and regulations have been strengthened on paper, global observers remain focused on actual implementation—prosecutions, convictions, and the political will to pursue high-level offenders. Weak enforcement or perceived selective justice can quickly erode international confidence.

For the administration of Ferdinand Marcos Jr., the issue is more than technical compliance. It is a test of credibility.

The country was previously removed from the grey list after committing to reforms and tighter oversight. Slipping back would signal not just policy failure, but governance fatigue—suggesting that reforms were temporary rather than institutional.

At a time when the Philippines is competing for foreign capital and trying to project stability, the message from global watchdogs is clear: compliance is not optional, and progress must be sustained.

The next steps taken by the government will determine whether this warning becomes a footnote—or a costly repeat of the past.