The investigation into the death of former Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) undersecretary Maria Catalina Cabral continues to raise difficult questions, as Interior Secretary Jonvic Remulla publicly cleared Cabral’s driver while pointing to what he described as “a lot of red flags” in the behavior of her husband.

Cabral was found lifeless on December 18 at the bottom of a deep ravine in Barangay Camp 8, Tuba, Benguet, after reportedly being dropped off by her driver along Kennon Road earlier that day. Authorities have said that, based on available evidence, the death is being treated as a “pointed suicide”, though investigations remain ongoing.

Driver Cleared After Questioning

According to Remulla, Cabral’s driver, Muñoz Hernandez, has been extensively questioned by authorities and is currently considered “clear and clean of everything” at this stage of the probe.

Hernandez told police that Cabral asked to be dropped off along the roadside at around 3 p.m. Two hours later, when she could no longer be contacted, he returned to look for her and eventually reported her missing. Cabral was later found unresponsive at around 8 p.m.

Remulla also confirmed that Hernandez’s cellphone is now being analyzed as part of standard investigative procedure. A photo taken by the driver — a selfie that included Cabral seated near the roadside barrier — later circulated online and drew public attention due to its timing and context. Authorities, however, said the image alone does not establish wrongdoing.

Focus Shifts to Husband’s Behavior

While clearing the driver, Remulla drew attention to the actions of Cabral’s husband, Caesar Cabral, saying his reactions raised concerns.

According to the Interior Secretary, the husband’s demeanor did not appear consistent with that of someone grieving. He also reportedly opposed an autopsy, believing his wife’s death was accidental — a position that authorities found unusual given the circumstances.

Despite the objection, an autopsy was conducted. Remulla said the results were consistent with blunt force trauma from a fall, with no signs of defensive wounds or indications of third-party involvement based on initial findings.

“What we know is that their relationship has been strained for a long time,” Remulla noted, adding that the couple had reportedly been living separately despite not being legally separated.

A Case Still Under Scrutiny

Cabral had resigned from the DPWH earlier this year after being linked to alleged irregularities in flood control and infrastructure projects — allegations she denied.

The ravine where she was found sits near an area connected to road works and quarry-related activity, further complicating the narrative. Local officials confirmed that documentation related to road quality, contractors, and rock-netting devices in the area has been forwarded to investigators.

Authorities have emphasized that while current findings point toward suicide, no angle is being prematurely closed, especially given the broader corruption issues surrounding infrastructure projects linked to Cabral’s former office.

Public Trust and Transparency

The contrasting developments — clearing the driver while casting doubt on the husband’s actions — have intensified public scrutiny. For many observers, the issue is no longer just about how Cabral died, but whether all relevant facts are being surfaced clearly and transparently.

As the investigation continues, officials insist that evidence, not speculation, will determine the final conclusions. Still, the case has underscored a recurring concern in high-profile deaths tied to governance and public funds: the need for credibility, consistency, and accountability at every stage of the process.

Until all findings are laid out in full, the questions surrounding Cabral’s death — and the circumstances leading up to it — remain firmly in the public eye.

Remulla at Asawa ni Cabral, Magkaiba ang Sinasabi: Nasaan ang mga Gadget at Cellphone?

Habang patuloy ang imbestigasyon sa pagkamatay ng dating DPWH Undersecretary na si Maria Catalina Cabral, lumutang ang isang seryosong tanong na hindi maaaring balewalain: nasaan ang kanyang mga personal na gamit—lalo na ang cellphone at laptop—at sino ang huling humawak nito?

Sa mga panayam na lumabas sa publiko, magkaiba ang sinasabi ng Interior Secretary Jonvic Remulla at ng asawa ni Cabral. At sa pagitan ng dalawang pahayag na ito, mas lalong lumalalim ang duda.

Ang Pahayag ni Remulla

Ayon kay Remulla, ang mga cellphone at laptop ni Cabral ay nasa pamilya, at kailangan pa raw itong hingin upang maisailalim sa pagsusuri.

“We’re asking it from the family kasi kinuha nila… the cellphone will be analyzed later… pati access sa laptop, but subject to subpoena ng Sandiganbayan, Ombudsman, o NBI.”

Sa pahayag na ito, malinaw ang sinasabi ng Kalihim:
✔️ May cellphone
✔️ May laptop
✔️ Nasa pamilya
✔️ Ipapasuri sa tamang proseso

Ngunit dito nagsisimula ang problema.

Ang Pahayag ng Asawa ni Cabral

Diretsahan namang itinanggi ng asawa ni Cabral ang ideya na may naibalik sa kanilang pamilya.

Ayon sa kanya:

“Ako hindi pa nakakita ng cellphone simula nung dumating ako… tsinelas na lang… kinausap ko anak ko, wala pa rin… wala silang gamit.”

Dagdag pa niya, wala raw anumang personal na gamit ang naibalik—walang cellphone, walang gadget, walang dokumento.

At kung totoo ito, lumalabas na walang hawak ang pamilya sa mga kritikal na ebidensyang binabanggit ni Remulla.

Dalawang Salaysay, Isang Tanong

Sa puntong ito, malinaw ang sitwasyon:

• Sinasabi ng Kalihim: nasa pamilya ang gadgets

• Sinasabi ng pamilya: wala silang natanggap ni isa

Hindi ito simpleng hindi pagkakaintindihan. Ang usapin ng cellphone at laptop ay kritikal dahil:

• Maaari itong maglaman ng komunikasyon

• Posibleng may ebidensya ng huling mga galaw

• Mahalaga sa timeline at motive analysis

Kung wala ito sa pamilya, kanino ito napunta?

Chain of Custody: Nasaan ang Butas?

Sa bawat high-profile investigation, mahalaga ang chain of custody — sino ang unang humawak, sino ang sumunod, at nasaan ngayon ang ebidensya.

Ngunit sa kasong ito:

• Walang malinaw na turnover

• Walang inventory na inilabas sa publiko

• Walang kumpirmasyon kung sino ang may hawak ngayon

At habang patuloy na ipinapasa ang tanong mula gobyerno patungong pamilya — at pabalik — ang katotohanan ay naiipit sa gitna.

Hindi Ito Tsismis, Ito ay Due Process

Hindi ito usapin ng paninisi. Ito ay usapin ng transparency.

Kung ang cellphone at laptop ay mahalaga sa imbestigasyon, dapat malinaw:

• Nasaan ito ngayon

• Kailan ito huling nakita

• Sino ang may responsibilidad dito

Kung hindi ito malinaw, masisira ang tiwala ng publiko — hindi lang sa kasong ito, kundi sa buong sistema ng hustisya.

Ang Tanong ng Bayan

Sa huli, iisa ang tanong ng taumbayan:

Kung magkaiba ang sinasabi ng Kalihim at ng pamilya, sino ang nagsasabi ng totoo?

At mas mahalaga:
Nasaan ang ebidensya?

Hangga’t walang malinaw na sagot, mananatiling bukas ang tanong — at hindi ito mawawala sa isip ng sambayanan.