When the Budget Is Under Scrutiny, Absence Becomes the Question

Calls are growing for the inclusion of Representative Stella Quimbo in ongoing flood control investigations and budget hearings, as questions continue to surface regarding anomalous allocations linked to past and proposed national budgets.

Former Presidential Anti-Corruption Commission (PACC) chair Greco Belgica has publicly urged that Quimbo be included in the probe, pointing out that accountability must extend beyond contractors and implementing agencies. According to Belgica, legislative participation in the budget process—especially in committees with influence over appropriations—demands scrutiny when irregularities emerge.

Flood control projects have long been vulnerable to misuse. Billions are allocated year after year, yet flooding persists in many communities, raising questions not only about execution but about how projects are inserted, approved, and prioritized in the budget.

At the heart of the issue is not accusation—but clarification.

When key figures linked to budget deliberations are absent from hearings meant to uncover the truth, public confidence weakens. Transparency requires participation. Silence, whether intentional or circumstantial, only deepens suspicion.

Good governance does not fear investigation.
It welcomes it.

Scripture reminds us of this standard:

“Whoever walks in integrity walks securely,
but whoever takes crooked paths will be found out.”
— Proverbs 10:9

This moment is an opportunity—not for political theater—but for reaffirming trust in the budget process.

Politikanta Minute takeaway:
When billions are involved, accountability cannot be selective. Every name tied to the process must be willing to face the questions.