Former Caloocan Representative Edgar Erice has stirred political discussion after making a pointed statement regarding opposition circles and their stance toward Vice President Sara Duterte.

In a recent video message, Erice said:

“Maski kasama ko sa civil society at mga kasama ko sa Dilawan—they are so afraid of a Sara presidency that they would rather sacrifice the truth.”

The remark highlights ongoing tensions within segments of the political opposition, particularly as early conversations surrounding the 2028 national elections continue to surface.

The Statement in Context

Erice, known for his outspoken positions and past alignment with opposition movements, suggested that fear of a potential Duterte presidency is influencing political narratives.

While he did not name specific individuals, his statement implies that some political actors may be allowing electoral calculations to shape how issues are framed or pursued.

The comment has drawn attention because it reflects internal debate within opposition ranks rather than criticism coming from pro-administration figures.

Political Anxiety Ahead of 2028

Although the 2028 elections are still years away, political positioning has already begun.

Vice President Sara Duterte remains one of the most visible national figures. Public surveys in previous quarters have shown fluctuating but consistently competitive ratings for her performance.

Speculation about possible presidential contenders often triggers strategic conversations within both administration and opposition camps.

Erice’s statement suggests that, in his view, fear of electoral defeat may be influencing political strategy.

The “Sacrifice the Truth” Claim

The most striking part of the statement is the allegation that some would “rather sacrifice the truth.”

This phrase implies concern over:

• Narrative framing

• Selective emphasis on issues

• Political messaging strategies

However, it remains a claim rather than an established fact.

No formal evidence was presented alongside the statement. It represents Erice’s interpretation of political motivations.

Reactions and Implications

Statements like this can have several implications:

1️⃣ Internal Opposition Debate
It signals disagreement within sectors of the opposition.

2️⃣ Electoral Strategy Tensions
Political camps often struggle between principle-driven messaging and strategic positioning.

3️⃣ Public Perception Impact
Such remarks may influence how voters interpret political conflicts.

At this stage, there has been no formal response from the individuals or groups allegedly referenced.

Political Fear as a Motivator

In democratic systems, political fear is not uncommon.

Fear of losing elections can shape:

• Coalition-building decisions

• Issue prioritization

• Messaging intensity

However, democratic processes rely on evidence-based discourse and institutional procedures.

The long-term health of democratic institutions depends on maintaining credibility and consistency in public arguments.

The Larger Conversation

The remark also reflects the broader polarization of Philippine politics.

As national figures prepare for possible future campaigns, debates are likely to intensify.

Whether Erice’s claim resonates widely will depend on:

• Public trust levels

• Performance ratings

• Emerging political alliances

Biblical Reflection on Truth and Fear

Political seasons often amplify emotions.

Scripture offers a reminder relevant to such discussions:

“You shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free.” — John 8:32

Fear and truth are powerful forces in public life. In democratic systems, truth is ideally tested through evidence, open debate, and institutional checks — not assumptions.

🧩 Final Perspective

Edgar Erice’s statement adds another layer to the evolving political conversation surrounding Vice President Sara Duterte and the 2028 election cycle.

It reflects internal tension within segments of the opposition and raises questions about political motivations.

At this point, the remark stands as a political opinion — one that may shape discussion but does not substitute for institutional findings or verified facts.

The coming years will determine whether electoral strategy, public trust, or policy direction becomes the defining factor in the next national campaign.