Mandaluyong City
COURTESY CALL OF H.E. SARAH HULTON, OBE
Tap to view
👁
Mandaluyong City
Your support keeps independent commentary alive.
☕ Buy us a coffee and keep the conversation going

Strong words alone
don’t clear the constitutional bar.
ML Party-list Representative Leila de Lima said allegations branding President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. as a drug addict—raised under the ground of betrayal of public trust—are conclusory and unsupported by factual allegations, rendering the second ground of the impeachment complaint insufficient in substance.
De Lima zeroed in on the claim that alleged drug addiction impairs the President’s judgment, questioning both its basis and proof.
“How do they know, or why do they claim, that it impairs his judgment? The second ground is insufficient in substance, I so submit,” she said.
Her remarks align with a broader theme emerging in House deliberations: impeachment is not a forum for suspicion without proof. Lawmakers across positions have emphasized that fitness claims must be tethered to evidence and demonstrable official acts, not inference.
Discreetly, the exchange narrows the lane. If allegations cannot establish facts, causation, and constitutional relevance, they struggle to survive the substance test—regardless of how loudly they are framed.
Quiet satire, committee-room edition: impeachment doesn’t weigh rumors; it weighs records.




Darryl Yap’s recent post about Vice President Sara Duterte struck a chord online, amassing thousands of comments and shares. His words painted a portrait of resilience: “Nagtitiwala, tumulong, tinraydor, siniraan, patuloy na pinahihirapan.”
For her supporters, Sara Duterte is not just a political figure — she is a daughter honoring her father’s legacy, and a leader standing up for the country amidst criticism and betrayal.
The post frames her as a defender of the nation, ready to battle what Yap describes as the “pulang halimaw na umuuto ng rosas,” a direct jab at political rivals. This strong imagery highlights how polarized Philippine politics has become — where allegiances, narratives, and symbols are constantly weaponized.
But beyond the rhetoric lies the bigger question: Can Sara Duterte truly rise above political attacks and prove herself as a unifying leader, or will she remain trapped in the cycle of partisan battles?
As the political landscape heats up, one thing remains clear — Sara Duterte continues to be a central figure in shaping the nation’s political future.
💭 What’s your take? Is Sara Duterte the resilient leader her supporters believe her to be — or just another political personality caught in the storm?
Disclaimer: This site uses publicly available images and materials for news, satire, and commentary. All rights belong to their respective owners. No copyright infringement intended.
© 2025 Politikanta Minute. All Rights Reserved.
Political Commentary • Satire • Faith-Based Reflection
Some visuals may be AI-generated for satire and illustration. Not real footage unless stated.

Disclaimer: This site uses publicly available images and materials for news, satire, and commentary. All rights belong to their respective owners. No copyright infringement intended.
© 2025 Politikanta Minute. All Rights Reserved.
Political Commentary • Satire • Faith-Based Reflection
Some visuals may be AI-generated for satire and illustration. Not real footage unless stated.