Malacañang has strongly responded to remarks made by Vice President Sara Duterte, calling her an “emotional vulture” and accusing her of being “all drama, no action.”

The unusually sharp language signals escalating tensions between the administration of President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. and the Vice President — a political alliance that once appeared solid but has since fractured publicly.

What Triggered the Exchange?

The Palace statement came after Vice President Duterte made remarks criticizing the administration, particularly in relation to political pressure and governance issues.

Instead of a measured rebuttal, Malacañang chose strong rhetoric — branding her statements as opportunistic and emotionally driven.

The phrase “emotional vulture” suggests the Palace believes Duterte is capitalizing on crises or controversies for political leverage.

Why This Matters

This is no longer quiet political distancing.

This is open confrontation.

When the President and Vice President — elected on the same ticket in 2022 — publicly clash, it sends signals to:

• Lawmakers
• Political allies
• Investors
• Foreign observers
• The public

Political instability often carries economic and governance consequences.

A Fractured Alliance

The Marcos–Duterte tandem was once framed as a “Unity” ticket. But in recent months:

• Policy disagreements surfaced
• Cabinet shifts occurred
• Public statements grew sharper
• Impeachment talks emerged

This latest exchange confirms that reconciliation is unlikely in the near term.

Political Strategy at Play?

Both sides may be positioning themselves ahead of 2028.

Strong rhetoric can serve to:

• Energize supporters
• Draw clearer political lines
• Shift media narratives
• Reinforce independence

But there is a risk: voters often tire of public bickering, especially during economic uncertainty.

Public Perception

The bigger question is not who said what.

It is whether the public sees governance improving.

Filipinos facing:

• High prices
• Budget issues
• Flood control controversies
• Sovereignty tensions

may be less interested in political word wars and more interested in solutions.

Final Thought

Politics thrives on conflict.

But leadership is measured by outcomes.

The war of words between Malacañang and the Vice President signals a deepening political divide.

The real test?
Whether governance continues — or becomes collateral damage.